Overall score
37% would take againTeaching quality
2.5
Grading fairness
3.3
Course difficulty
3.3
Attendance strictness
3.5
- Teaching quality:★★★★★Grading fairness:★★★★★Would not take again
Goes straight to intermediate and advance without making the foundation. Terrible at explaining and teaching. Expect us to learn on our own. Bad lab experience. The only positive side is that he provide theory slides, nothing else
Distant - Teaching quality:★★★★★Grading fairness:★★★★★Would take againEncourages questionsGenerous grader
- Teaching quality:★★★★★Grading fairness:★★★★★Would not take again
Goes for advanced stuff without building a proper foundation. Lab experience is terrible.
Explains on the boardExams don't match lecturesDistant - Teaching quality:★★★★★Grading fairness:★★★★★Would not take againExams don't match lectures
- Teaching quality:★★★★★Grading fairness:★★★★★Would not take again
- Teaching quality:★★★★★Grading fairness:★★★★★Would take again
- Teaching quality:★★★★★Grading fairness:★★★★★Would not take again
Not supportive. Exam questions were nowhere close to what he taught in class.
Exams don't match lecturesStingy with marksDistant - Teaching quality:★★★★★Grading fairness:★★★★★Would take again
His teaching quality is good. He can explain clearly. His behavior is cold so others hate him. But I like him as he teaches good.
Inspiring teacherEncourages questions